{"id":175751,"date":"2024-06-04T11:52:24","date_gmt":"2024-06-04T10:52:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.iucn.nl\/no-category\/wat-betekent-de-critical-raw-materials-act-voor-natuur-en-mensenrechten\/"},"modified":"2024-06-07T10:47:30","modified_gmt":"2024-06-07T09:47:30","slug":"what-does-the-critical-raw-materials-act-mean-for-nature-and-human-rights","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.iucn.nl\/en\/news\/what-does-the-critical-raw-materials-act-mean-for-nature-and-human-rights\/","title":{"rendered":"What does the Critical Raw Materials Act mean for nature and human rights?"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

In May 2024, the European Critical Raw Materials Act (CRMA) came into force. An important regulation concerning the extraction and use of critical raw materials. The regulation aims to ensure that sufficient raw materials are available in Europe to meet growing demand. Antoinette Sprenger, senior expert on environmental justice at IUCN NL, explains what the introduction of this law means for nature and human rights.<\/strong><\/strong><\/h4>\n<\/div>\n\n
\n

Header photo: Stephanie Broekarts IUCN NL, nickel mine near Siuna, central Sulawesi<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n

\n

\u2018Given the global transition to renewable energy and the digitalisation of our economies and societies, demand for the critical raw materials that make this transition possible, like nickel<\/a>, lithium and bauxite<\/a> (aluminium) is expected to increase exponentially in the coming decades,\u2019 Sprenger says. ‘This means that we need to be more careful with these raw materials, put more effort into circularity and reuse, and consume less. However, this will probably not fully address the increased demand, so extraction of new critical raw materials will be unavoidable and therefore, unfortunately, the exploitation of new mines.’<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n

\n

CRMA’s approach mainly economic<\/strong><\/strong><\/h2>\n<\/div>\n\n
\n

The aim of the CRMA is to strengthen commodity value chains in the European Union. It therefore has an economic angle in particular. Access to raw materials is essential for the economy. Certain raw materials are considered critical because of their high economic importance and because supply is highly concentrated from a limited number of countries outside of Europe. The CRMA addresses this risk. Thus, it includes measures to ensure that imports of critical raw materials become more diversified (no more than 65% dependence on a third country) and that the European Union’s capacities increase in terms of extraction (at least 10% of annual consumption by 2030), processing (at least 40% of annual consumption) and reuse (at least 25% of annual consumption).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n

\n

CRMA and sustainability<\/strong><\/strong><\/h2>\n<\/div>\n\n
\n

To promote sustainability, the CRMA includes measures to ensure that the recovery of critical raw materials from extractive waste is facilitated by, for example, prescribing labelling for the presence of permanent magnets found in wind turbines, among others. There are also recycling capacity targets in the regulation.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n

\n

Sprenger: \u2018By promoting circularity and the sustainable use of critical raw materials and increasing recycling capacity within the EU, good steps are being taken. It is very important to fully commit to this. As a result, we will hopefully need to extract fewer raw materials in the long run, which can limit damage to nature.’<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n

\n

CRMA and nature<\/strong><\/strong><\/h2>\n<\/div>\n\n
\n

The CRMA states that existing European legislation to protect nature and the environment must be complied with. This means that the extraction of critical raw materials must take into account European Directives such as environmental impact assessment, conservation of natural habitats and wild flora and fauna, birdlife and water policy.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n

\n

For nature outside<\/em> Europe, international agreements and national legislation must be adhered to. Sprenger: \u2018It is important to comply with European nature legislation. However, it is a missed opportunity not to include protected natural areas, tropical forests, wetlands, vulnerable ecosystems and key biodiversity areas outside Europe as no-go zones where resource extraction is not allowed. To combat climate change and further biodiversity loss, but also for local water and food supply, these areas are crucial. If we are serious about meeting the international climate and biodiversity targets, as defined in the Climate Convention<\/a> and the Global Biodiversity Framework<\/a>, we must spare these areas.’<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n

\n

In its sustainability measures, the CRMA makes an exception for so-called strategic projects. These are projects that are deemed to serve the public interest and are of higher importance than nature, allowing the aforementioned legislation to be set aside. Furthermore, the deadlines for environmental assessments and environmental permits are relatively short, allowing decisions to be made without fully assessing all risks, including risks to nature and human rights.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n

\n

CRMA and human rights<\/strong><\/strong><\/h2>\n<\/div>\n\n
\n

\u2018Sprenger: \u2018Regarding the original inhabitants of areas with plans for mining, it is disappointing that the \u201cfree prior informed consent\u201d (FPIC) principle is not explicitly mentioned in the CRMA. It only stipulates that they should be \u2018meaningfully consulted\u2019. Research has shown that 54% of the resources needed for the energy transition are in areas of indigenous people and local communities[1]<\/sup><\/a> https:\/\/theconversation.com\/54-of-projects-extracting-clean-energy-minerals-overlap-with-indigenous-lands-research-reveals-195438<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/span>